Contact

Bring the messy problem. We will make the governance visible.

Article 11 is built for people who need AI to help without hiding responsibility. Send the use case, the risk, and what would make the work trustworthy.

DirectNo sales gauntlet. A real person reads the request.
PracticalStart with one workflow, one risk, and one useful outcome.
CarefulAccess, secrets, and publication choices stay in human hands.
ReceiptedImportant decisions can be written into a reviewable record.

What To Send

Pick the lane that matches the work.

A short, honest note is enough. If the problem is sensitive, say that first and we can slow down the intake before details move around.

Governance

AI policy or workflow audit

Send the system, the users, the decisions it touches, and where you need auditability or human review.

Sovereign AI

Constitutional AI layer

Send the role you want AI to hold, what it should never do, and what bounded choices it should be allowed to make.

Federal

Contract desk and VetCert work

Send the opportunity type, NAICS or keywords, set-aside needs, deadline pressure, and review workflow.

Website

Warm public education

Send the audience, the pages that feel confusing, and the proof or visuals people need before they trust it.

Press

Origin and public record

Send what you want to verify. Article 11 tries to separate public receipts, legal status, and first-person memory.

Access

Admin or staff account

Send the email address, the person, the role, and the exact tool they need. Access changes require human approval.

Primary Door

collective@article11.ai

Best for project intake, partner notes, public questions, and anything that should enter the Article 11 collaboration lane.

Founder Door

steve@article11.ai

Best for direct business conversations, federal contracting, legal coordination, and founder-level questions.

What Happens Next

The first answer should reduce confusion.

You should know whether Article 11 can help, what the first small build would be, what decisions stay human, and what evidence would prove the work is moving in the right direction.

Scope

We name the narrow workflow before promising a broad transformation.

Boundary

We identify secrets, access controls, legal review, and publication gates early.

Receipt

We decide what should be logged, who can inspect it, and how corrections are handled.

Useful First Note

Five lines are enough.

Tell us who the work is for, what AI should help with, what could go wrong, what outcome matters, and what proof would make you comfortable moving forward.

A collaborative review moment with visible disagreement

Open Book, Guarded Door

Useful AI should be easier to question.

That is the whole premise. Bring the question, the hesitation, or the build idea. We will start there.